"Creation Isn't Science - It's not testable"
Many evolutionists and atheists alike have - throughout history -
shunned Scripture and the lessons learned therein by claiming that
Creation Science isn't testable, repeatable, observable, and so
forth. As this is true about certain aspects of Creation Science,
this is also true about certain aspects of Evolutionary "Science".
One cannot deny the overwhelming amounts of assumptions and
un-justifiable dedications that materialists demonstrate.
Both Creation and Evolutionism start with philosophical assumptions.
Evolutionists (traditionally) start with the assumption that God has
no intervention in this world. This isn't a testable conclusion;
they didn't come to this conclusion by science. Creationists have
the philosophical position that God has partaken in the history of
this earth, and that He has revealed the True history of the earth
through His infallible Word.
As you can see, both Creation and Evolutionism start with
philosophical premises. There are many aspects of the Creation
Theory that are indeed testable also. For instance, the Bible states
that earth was created roughly 6,000 years ago(1), in six literal
days(2). Evolutionism claims that the earth came into existence some
15-20 billion years ago(3), over a very long and tedious process of
formation. Both of these teachings can be tested to some extent.
It's important to also emphasize the knowledge difference between
fallible man (who is a fallen creature), and the Omniscient God,
Creator and sustainer of all.
When man inspects the earth, the biosphere, the world around us, we
formulate hypothesis as to how things came to be as they are today.
After data is brought in and analyzed, we can test our hypothesis
and see what outcomes we're given. Creationists already have the
Truth; the earth was created roughly 6,000 years ago1. Evolutionists
wish to construct their own truth; the earth formed slowly over
billions of years. Both of these are subject to the same scientific
method. When we observe the outpourings of data rendered from the
science, we can see that the evidence greatly supports the idea of a
young-earth (6,000 years old).
Now, we can see that both Creation and Evolutionism have
non-testable aspects about them, and also testable aspects about
them as well. Creation Science Evangelism wishes not to invite
Creation into public schools, but only to have incorrect information
extracted from taxpayer-purchased textbooks. Schools have a legal,
as well as moral obligation to remain truthful to our students.
Unfortunately, many schools today have veered from this path and
have accepted voodoo-science as part of their curriculum. Material
such as the gill slits, the horse evolution, the human evolution,
the evolution of the giraffe, and so much more are still presented
to children as facts, and done so dogmatically.
When will America - as well as the rest of the World - wake up and
smell the indoctrination. Millions of children everyday are being
presented with information that is testable, has been tested, and is
now scratched off as untrue in the scientific literature. Even our
SAT's are presenting incorrect information to our fervent studiers.
Both Creation and Evolutionism are testable in certain areas and
un-testable in others, both of been tested, and only one prevails -
Creation. We were fearfully and wonderfully created, and we will
soon stand before He that creates and give an account for the life
we lived. Will you be ready?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. These figures are found by adding up the genealogies found in
scripture, and by Jesus' teachings of man's history.
2. Exodus 20:11, Mark 10:6, Matthew 19:4, and Genesis 1...
3. This number varies slightly with different evolutionists.